I forgot to write about this a while ago, so I just wanted to take the time and write a quickie on the NYSTCE. So, I decided to take two of the Teacher Certification Tests a couple weekends ago. It was such a hectic summer, that I didn't get to prepare at all. I was told, by multiple--well everyone I know who's a teacher or pre-service teacher--people, that there was no need to study. Well, let me tell you... they were right.
It was kinda' insulting, to be completely honest. I guess they're just checking that future teachers are competent. Some of the questions were ridiculous. I don't want to get into this, as this isn't what I really wanted to write about, but on a side note, the tests were incredibly easy.
What I really wanted to talk about was the test itself: a non-contextualized multiple-choice test.
As I mentioned above, these tests were astonishingly simple, so I didn't have a hard time. But, there were a lot of questions--especially in the English sections--that I hesitated. I knew the answer "they" wanted me to give, but there were others that could have easily been defended as being the "correct" answer.
So what about the Regents. I'm trying to teach these kids not to be mindless-drones, and now they have to pick out ambiguous answers that have no relevance to anything?
I read a great article in the English Journal today--I'd love to tell you which one and by who, but I'm way too lazy to get up out right now.
They author basically just stated how teachers don't work together and should. Basically his theory was that if teacher's work together--without being offended, bickering, and all the other child-like issues--they will be able to teach English the way they feel it should be taught. But for now, he is stating the obvious: teachers do their own thing, teach the way they want during the year, then at the last minute teach to the test... awesome.
Well, just some food for thought for moi. Cheers.
Recent Comments